by Tim Coomer, Specific Software
I recently had the opportunity to review the WorkCompEdge site with the risk manager of a large corporation. It was a fascinating conversation because he had extensive experience, possessed an analytical mind (I’m partial to those), and could tell a story related to every topic within WorkCompEdge. But, for this blog, I wanted to share with you one particular insight I gained from this meeting.
If your “defense system” lets 100% of your potential new hires through, you need to be concerned.
In the Avoid Hiring Your Next Workers Comp Injury module, we discuss the importance of the post-offer, pre-employment medical screening. Bob (not his real name) shared his experiences with this method for preventing a new hire from quickly becoming your newest work comp claim. Bob verified what we thought when we developed this module: he had definitely seen situations in which an effective medical exam program made a dramatic impact on the frequency of work comp claims and resulted in verifiable long term significant savings. But, just as importantly, he had also seen cases in which the effort to screen out candidates with preexisting conditions or physical ailments or limitations was NOT effective.
This got my attention, of course. I asked Bob, “How can you tell in the early stages of a medical screening effort whether or not it’s effective?” His answer, in retrospect, makes so much analytical sense that I’m almost embarrassed to admit I hadn’t thought of it! “Look at the reject rates, “Bob said. “If you’re passing 100% of the candidates, you have a problem.”
This reminded me of a challenge from my days of working in the defense industry. A ballistic missile delivers a number of decoys and a number of actual weapons to a target. A defense system must determine which of the missile’s reentry vehicles (RVs) are real threats and which ones are not. It can’t identify everything as a threat but it also can’t decide nothing is a threat. If your defense system lets everything in, you know you have a problem! The same principle applies to the medical screening of potential new employees. If your “defense system” lets 100% of your potential new hires through, you need to be concerned. Especially in a challenging labor intensive industry, you can expect to hear a very loud boom in the near future.
So, do you know the percentage of rejects that occur with your medical screening effort? If you have multiple locations across your state or across the country, how do the reject rates compare? Does this correlate to the level of work comp claims by location? If work comp claims are particularly low in a specific location and medical rejects are high, perhaps you need to model that screening or defensive system at your other locations. What do you think? Let us know with your comments.
http://www.workcompedge.com/
http://www.specificsoftware.com/
Filed under: Hiring Practices
